FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M350 is 1000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |