FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M465X has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 3500 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 14% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |