FirePro M7740 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M7740 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M7740 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 400% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 93 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4012 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 377% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 386% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 455% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 407% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 234% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 392% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |