FirePro R5000 vs GeForce 920M
In this comparison between FirePro R5000 and GeForce 920M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro R5000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 920M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
FirePro R5000
GeForce 920M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
33 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro R5000 has 960% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
FirePro R5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce 920M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920M - in Laptops.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 920M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 and GeForce 920M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
190−200
60−65
medium / 768p
160−170
27−30
ultra / 1080p
90−95
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 421% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
85−90
10−11
ultra / 1080p
55−60
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
21−24
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
0−1
low / 768p
80−85
18−20
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
50−55
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
45−50
0−1
medium / 768p
30−33
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
FirePro R5000
GeForce 920M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Pitcairn
N16V-GM-S
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
25 February 2013
27 January 2015
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
825 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
30.53
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
297.6 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price