FirePro R5000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FirePro R5000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro R5000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro R5000
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro R5000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro R5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
5−6
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
190−200
210−220
medium / 768p
160−170
180−190
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
55−60
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
130−140
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
55−60
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
9−10
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
45−50
55−60
medium / 768p
30−33
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
50−55
FirePro R5000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro R5000
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Pitcairn
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
25 February 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
768
96
Core clock speed
825 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
