FirePro R5000 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between FirePro R5000 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro R5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro R5000 has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 1800 MHz higher, than FirePro R5000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
5−6
35−40
4K / 2160p
4−5
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
90−95
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
130−140
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
90−95
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
80−85
140−150
medium / 768p
70−75
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 107% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
30−33
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FirePro R5000.
Full Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Code name
Pitcairn
GM204
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 February 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
768
1,024
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
67.20
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price