FirePro S10000 vs GeForce 845M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce 845M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against GeForce 845M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 845M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 845M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 845M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 845M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1566% more power consumption, than GeForce 845M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 845M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 845M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 845M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 845M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 845M is 246 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce 845M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 466% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro S10000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 344% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 477% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce 845M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 845M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | GM108 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1071 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 37.63 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 883.7 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |