FirePro S10000 vs GeForce 940M
When comparing FirePro S10000 and GeForce 940M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce 940M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 940M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 940M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 940M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 247 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce 940M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce 940M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 940M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 940M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | N16S-GT-S/B |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 12 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 28.22 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 101 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |