FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GT 640M
When choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 640M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 640M.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GT 640M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2243% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 640M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 640M - with Kepler.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 640M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 640M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GT 640M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N13P-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 645 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |