FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTS 160M
When comparing FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTS 160M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTS 160M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 160M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 675 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
Code name | Tahiti | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 192 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs UHD Graphics 615
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce GTS 160M vs UHD Graphics 615
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon HD 8730M