FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- FirePro S10000 has 368% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 46 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S10000 is 95 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GF114 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 779 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | 210 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- FirePro S10000 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M