FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 119 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 965M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 950 / 1151 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 226 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon HD 8970M
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930