FirePro S10000 vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Tahiti | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Quadro 3000M
- FirePro S10000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850