FirePro S10000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 4900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 410% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 609% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | Tahiti | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X