FirePro S10000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 122 GB more memory, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Tahiti | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FirePro S10000 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book