FirePro S10000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

When comparing FirePro S10000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S10000

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro S10000	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	750 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	40−45	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	55−60	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	5−6
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 129% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S10000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	180−190
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	55−60
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S10000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	45−50	18−20
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	20−22
QHD / 1440p	27−30	12−14
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	9−10
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	130−140	55−60
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	20−22
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	FirePro S10000	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Tahiti	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 November 2012	15 August 2020
Pipelines	4096	96
Core clock speed	825 MHz
Boost Clock	950 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	106.4
Floating-point performance	2x 3,405 gflops
Length	305 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	383 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+
Form factor	full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S10000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares