FirePro S10000 vs Quadro 3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro 3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against Quadro 3000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro 3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 900% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 4375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Quadro 3000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | Fermi |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 18.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 625 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 28 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |