FirePro S10000 vs Quadro 4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro 4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro 4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tahiti | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 82 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |