FirePro S10000 vs Quadro 5010M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro 5010M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro 5010M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tahiti | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |