FirePro S10000 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1263% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S10000 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S10000 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S10000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |