FirePro S10000 vs Quadro K620M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro K620M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro K620M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2400% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 204 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |