FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M2000

When comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S10000

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S10000	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	750 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S10000 has 900% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 29 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S10000 is 104 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	6−7
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	35−40	12−14
4K / 2160p	18−20	8−9
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 74% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	120−130
QHD / 1440p	110−120	90−95
4K / 2160p	70−75	50−55
high / 768p	210−220	170−180
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	30−35	14−16
4K / 2160p	24−27	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	65−70	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
QHD / 1440p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	130−140	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S10000	Quadro M2000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 November 2012	8 April 2016
Pipelines	4096	768
Core clock speed	825 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1163 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	106.4	55.82
Floating-point performance	2x 3,405 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	305 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	383 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares