FirePro S10000 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When comparing FirePro S10000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 4870 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro S10000 has 162% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- FirePro S10000 is 38 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465