FirePro S10000 vs Radeon Pro 5500M
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 782% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 7000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | Tahiti | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 139.2 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI