FirePro S10000 vs Radeon Pro 555
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 555. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro 555. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |