FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R7 M370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R7 M370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against Radeon R7 M370, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 50 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M370. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tahiti | Litho |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 875 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 960 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 70 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |