FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 M275
When choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M275, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M275.
FirePro S10000
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tahiti | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 122 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |