FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
When choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
FirePro S10000
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S10000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Tahiti | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M