FirePro M7740 vs FirePro S7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M7740 and FirePro S7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M7740 stacks up against FirePro S7000, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | FirePro S7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 483% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and FirePro S7000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro S7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and FirePro S7000 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 300 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro S7000 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3800 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 140% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M7740. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | FirePro S7000 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | RV740 | Pitcairn |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 27 August 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |