FirePro S7000 vs FirePro W4190M
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and FirePro W4190M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others FirePro W4190M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | FirePro W4190M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FirePro W4190M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W4190M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro W4190M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 125 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro S7000 and FirePro W4190M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 320% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 189% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 337% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | FirePro W4190M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Pitcairn | Mars XTX? |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 12 November 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |