FirePro S7000 vs FirePro W7170M
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M.
FirePro S7000
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | FirePro W7170M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W7170M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro W7170M - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 227 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 1% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | FirePro W7170M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |