FirePro S7000 vs GeForce 840M
When comparing FirePro S7000 and GeForce 840M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce 840M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
GeForce 840M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 840M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 840M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 960% more power consumption, than GeForce 840M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 840M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 840M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 840M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 840M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 79 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 840M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 840M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 580% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 455% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than GeForce 840M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 840M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 840M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | N15S-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 92 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |