FirePro S7000 vs GeForce 920M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 920M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 960% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 920M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 920M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 4 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce 920M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce 920M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N16V-GM-S |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 27 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 954 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 40 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |