FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 SE, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- FirePro S7000 has 133% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 350 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7000 is 284 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GF104 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 15 November 2010 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 288 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 31.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |