FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 186% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 230 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 23 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 57 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |