FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 760M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 760M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 760M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 536% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 293 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 760M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N14E-GL |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 657 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 54 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |