FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 850M
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 677% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 850M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 850M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N15P-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 36.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 153 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |