FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX450
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX450.
FirePro S7000
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 445 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5202 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 17% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce MX450. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX450 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Pitcairn | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 100.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 10002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |