FirePro S7000 vs Iris Graphics 540
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Graphics 540, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against Iris Graphics 540, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 60 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 136% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 96% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 118% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Pitcairn | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |