FirePro S7000 vs Iris Graphics 550
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Graphics 550, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Iris Graphics 550.
FirePro S7000
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 60 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 91% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 118% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 550. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Pitcairn | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |