FirePro S7000 vs Iris Graphics 6100
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Iris Graphics 6100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 6100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 195% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 281% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |