FirePro S7000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 137% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 225% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 354% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | Pitcairn | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 270
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X