FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 44% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 37 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R9 270
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000