FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 536% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 88 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 17% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M2000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 173 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |