FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M2200
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 536% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 256 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 708 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |