FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M4000

When comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S7000

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S7000	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S7000 has 191% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 177 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S7000 is 51 mm longer, than Quadro M4000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 1208 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	12−14	35−40
4K / 2160p	8−9	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	120−130	180−190
QHD / 1440p	95−100	110−120
4K / 2160p	50−55	70−75
high / 768p	170−180	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	40−45
QHD / 1440p	20−22	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	180−190
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	30−35
4K / 2160p	14−16	24−27
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	40−45	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	120−130
high / 1080p	40−45	70−75
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
QHD / 1440p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
medium / 768p	45−50	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7000	Quadro M4000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Pitcairn	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2012	29 June 2015
Pipelines	1280	1664
Core clock speed	950 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	80.39
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	292 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	272 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares