FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M500M
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M500M.
FirePro S7000
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 79 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 796 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 337% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 640% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 425% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro M500M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M500M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | GM108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 15 December 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4004 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |