FirePro S7000 vs Quadro P3200
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro P3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro P3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6080 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 242 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 2208 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 93% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 97% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |