FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 270 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 1% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 270
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- FirePro S7000 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050