FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 150 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 56% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 127 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |